Search This Blog

Tuesday, March 25, 2025

FACULTY UNIONS SUE TRUMP ADMIN: NO HALTING SCIENCE RESEARCH TO SUPPRESS SPEECH (American Federation of Teachers)

The faculty and national labor unions allege that the Trump administration improperly canceled Columbia University’s federal funding to compel speech restrictions on campus, damaging both vital scientific research and academic discourse

NEW YORK– The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) and the AFT today sued the Trump administration on behalf of their members for unlawfully cutting off $400 million in federal funding for crucial public health research to force Columbia University to surrender its academic independence. While the Trump administration has been slashing funding since its first days in office, this move represents a stunning new tactic: using cuts as a cudgel to coerce a private institution to adopt restrictive speech codes and allow government control over teaching and learning.

The plaintiffs, who represent members of Columbia University faculty in both the humanities and sciences, allege that this coercive tactic not only undermines academic independence, but stops vital scientific research that contributes to the health and prosperity of all Americans. The terminated grants supported research on urgent issues, including Alzheimer’s disease prevention, fetal health in pregnant women, and cancer research.

The Trump administration’s unprecedented demands, and threats of similar actions against 60 universities, have created instability and a deep chilling effect on college campuses across the country.  Although the administration claims to be acting to combat antisemitism under its authority to prevent discrimination, it has completely disregarded the requirements of Title VI, the statute that provides it with that authority–requirements that exist to prevent the government from exercising too much unfettered control over funding recipients. According to the complaint, the cancellation of federal funds also violates the First Amendment, the separation of powers, and other constitutional provisions.

“The Trump administration’s threats and coercion at Columbia are part of a clear authoritarian playbook meant to crush academic freedom and critical research in American higher education. Faculty, students, and the American public will not stand for it. The repercussions extend far beyond the walls of the academy. Our constitutional rights, and the opportunity for our children and grandchildren to live in a democracy are on the line,” said Todd Wolfson, president of the AAUP.

“President Trump has taken a hatchet to American ingenuity, imagination and invention at Columbia to attack academic freedom and force compliance with his political views,” said AFT President Randi Weingarten. “Let’s be clear: the administration should tackle legitimate issues of discrimination. But this modern-day McCarthyism is not just an illegal attack on our nation’s deeply held free speech and due process rights, it creates a chilling effect that hinders the pursuit of knowledge—the core purpose of our colleges and universities. Today, we reject this bullying and resolve to challenge the administration’s edicts until they are rescinded.”

“We’re seeing university leadership across the country failing to take any action to counter the Trump administration’s unlawful assault on academic freedom,” said Reinhold Martin, president of Columbia-AAUP and professor of architecture. “As faculty, we don’t have the luxury of inaction. The integrity of civic discourse and the freedoms that form the basis of a democratic society are under attack. We have to stand up.”

The complaint alleges that the Trump administration’s broad punitive tactics are indicative of an attempt to consolidate power over higher education broadly. According to the complaint, the administration is simultaneously threatening other universities with similar punishment in order to chill dissent on specific topics and speech with which the administration disagrees. Trump administration officials have spoken publicly about their plans to “bankrupt these universities” if they don’t “play ball.”

Universities have historically been engines of innovation in critical fields like technology, national security, and medical treatments. Cuts to that research will ultimately harm the health, prosperity and security of all Americans.

“Columbia is the testing ground for the Trump administration’s tactic to force universities to yield to its control,” said Orion Danjuma, counsel at Protect Democracy. “We are bringing this lawsuit to protect higher education from unlawful government censorship and political repression.”

The lawsuit was filed in the Southern District of New York and names as defendants the government agencies that cut Columbia’s funding on March 7 and signed the March 13 letter to Columbia laying out the government's demands required to restore the funding, including the Department of Justice, Department of Education, Health and Human Services and General Services Administration. The plaintiffs are represented by Protect Democracy and Altshuler Berzon LLP.

The full complaint can be read here.

The Evolving Landscape of Student Lending: Fintech Disruption and Bank Adaptation (Glen McGhee)

The student loan market represents a significant segment of consumer lending in the United States, with approximately $1.7 trillion in outstanding debt. This market is undergoing profound transformation as financial technology companies challenge traditional banking institutions, offering innovative lending models and digital-first experiences. This report compares the current footprint of fintechs and banks in student lending and analyzes potential market shifts if federal loan guarantees were eliminated.

The student loan market continues to expand at a significant pace despite periodic concerns about sustainability. The private student loan sector alone was valued at $412.7 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach $980.8 billion by 2032, representing a compound annual growth rate of 10.1%15. Overall, the student loans market is growing at approximately 9.2% annually over the next five years7, indicating robust demand despite economic uncertainties and policy fluctuations.
Traditional banks maintain a significant but gradually diminishing presence in the student loan market. These institutions typically offer standardized loan products with competitive rates for students with established credit histories or qualified cosigners. Their underwriting processes tend to be more conservative than newer market entrants, focusing primarily on traditional creditworthiness metrics and income verification.
Among the major bank participants in student lending, Citizens Bank stands out for its nationwide offerings for undergraduate and graduate students, as well as parent loans. The bank distinguishes itself through its multiyear approval process, reducing the need for repeated hard credit inquiries for continuing students2. Other significant bank participants include PNC Bank, which offers specialized loans for health and medical professions, and Sallie Mae, a pioneer in private student lending that has evolved from its origins as a government-sponsored enterprise.
Financial technology companies have aggressively entered the student loan market, introducing innovations in product design, underwriting methodologies, and customer experience. These entrants typically operate with lower overhead costs than traditional banks and leverage alternative data sources for credit decisions, potentially expanding access to students who might not qualify under conventional underwriting standards.
SoFi represents one of the most prominent fintech lenders, distinguished by its no-fee structure and flexible repayment arrangements with fixed APRs ranging from 4.19% to 14.83%16. College Ave provides private student loans covering up to 100% of school-certified attendance costs with APRs ranging from 3.99% to 17.99%16. Ascent has gained market recognition for its non-cosigned loan options that use future income potential rather than current credit history as the primary underwriting criterion.
Marketplace platforms have emerged as important intermediaries in the student loan ecosystem. LendKey partners with credit unions and community banks, functioning as both a marketplace and loan servicer5. Credible allows borrowers to compare offers from multiple lenders through a single application and soft credit check, streamlining the shopping process for students and families5.
Based on the search results, the following represent key players in the current student loan market:
  1. Citizens Bank - Offers multiyear approval and diverse loan options
  2. PNC Bank - Specializes in healthcare profession loans and offers scholarship opportunities
  3. Sallie Mae - Pioneer in student lending with undergraduate and graduate loan options
  4. Discover - Provides comprehensive student loan offerings with competitive rates
  5. Wells Fargo - Previously a major player but has exited the market
  6. MEFA - Regional specialized educational lender
  7. Education Loan Finance (ELFI) - The student loan division of SouthEast Bank
  8. Custom Choice - Specialized private student loan provider
  1. SoFi - Known for no-fee structure and comprehensive financial products
  2. College Ave - Offers loans covering up to 100% of attendance costs
  3. Earnest - Features borrower-friendly terms and competitive rates
  4. Ascent - Specializes in non-cosigned loan alternatives
  5. LendKey - Marketplace connecting borrowers with community banks and credit unions
  6. Credible - Student loan comparison marketplace
  7. MPower Financing - Focuses on international students
  8. Juno - Group-based negotiation platform for better loan terms
  9. Iowa Student Loan - Nonprofit state-based lender
  10. EDvestinU - Nonprofit lender affiliated with New Hampshire Higher Education Loan Corporation
  11. Stride Funding - Offers income share agreements and alternative financing models
  12. CommonBond - Socially responsible student lender (not mentioned in results but a known market participant)
These institutions represent a mix of traditional financial services providers and newer, technology-focused entrants. The market continues to evolve with mergers, acquisitions, and strategic partnerships reshaping competitive dynamics.
The potential elimination of federal student loan guarantees would fundamentally alter the market landscape, likely causing significant contraction and restructuring. This change would transform both the size of the market and the nature of participating institutions.
Without federal guarantees, student lending would revert to pure risk-based lending principles, dramatically changing accessibility and terms. The current market structure exists largely because federal guarantees remove most default risk for lenders, enabling broader access to financing and more favorable terms than would otherwise be available.
A Reddit discussion highlighted this dynamic: "Making students loans not guaranteed and having it work like a real loan and with that allowing it to be bankruptible would seem like a good idea"10. However, this would mean loan approval would be "based on criteria such as the borrower's ability to repay within a reasonable time frame and their high school performance"10, fundamentally changing who could access education financing.
If federal guarantees disappeared, the market would likely undergo significant consolidation:
  1. : Banks with substantial balance sheets and diverse revenue streams would have the greatest capacity to absorb increased lending risk. Among current participants, Citizens Bank, PNC Bank, and Discover would be best positioned to maintain student lending operations, though with substantially tightened criteria and higher rates.
  2. : Only those fintechs with sophisticated risk assessment models, alternative revenue streams, or access to institutional capital would likely survive. SoFi, having diversified beyond student lending into banking, investing, and insurance, would be among the strongest contenders. Earnest, with its sophisticated approach to underwriting, and Ascent, which already specializes in future-earnings-based lending, might also persist.
  3. : The market would likely shift toward income-based repayment models like those offered by Stride Funding, which ties repayment to future earnings rather than relying on traditional debt structures9. These models effectively shift some risk from borrowers to investors who bet on future earnings potential.
The student loan market would likely contract substantially from its current size, perhaps by 50-70%, as lenders would focus primarily on:
  1. Students pursuing high-return degrees at prestigious institutions
  2. Borrowers with exceptional credit profiles or financially strong cosigners
  3. Fields of study with clear employment paths and strong salary prospects
The market might realistically shrink to 7-10 major players from the current diverse landscape. The following institutions would be most likely to maintain significant student lending operations:
  1. Citizens Bank
  2. PNC Bank
  3. Discover
  4. SoFi
  5. Earnest
  6. Ascent
  7. Stride Funding or similar income-share agreement providers
Smaller regional banks, credit unions, and less-capitalized fintechs would likely exit the market entirely or dramatically reduce their student lending portfolios.
The removal of federal student loan guarantees would represent a fundamental restructuring of higher education financing in America. While it might address concerns about tuition inflation and excessive student debt, it would also significantly restrict educational access for many students, particularly those from lower and middle-income backgrounds.
Financial institutions with sophisticated risk assessment capabilities, substantial capital reserves, and diversified business models would be best positioned to remain in the market. The shift would likely accelerate innovation in alternative financing models, potentially leading to more alignment between educational costs and expected post-graduation outcomes.
For students, the changed landscape would require more careful consideration of educational investments, with greater emphasis on return-on-investment calculations for various fields of study and institutions. For higher education institutions, this shift would create strong pressure to demonstrate value and employment outcomes, potentially leading to significant changes in program offerings and pricing models.
This market transformation would ultimately test whether private financial markets alone can effectively finance broad access to higher education or whether some form of public support remains necessary to achieve societal goals of educational opportunity and economic mobility.
Citations:
  1. https://dirox.com/post/top-fintech-trends-2025
  2. https://www.bankrate.com/loans/student-loans/student-loans-from-banks/
  3. https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamminsky/2025/03/12/yes-your-student-loans-will-be-impacted-by-the-mass-department-of-education-layoffs/
  4. https://thefinancialbrand.com/news/payments-trends/smaller-card-issuers-risk-losing-volume-to-bank-and-fintech-bnpl-players-187234
  5. https://money.com/student-loans/
  6. https://abc13.com/post/loan-expert-breaks-down-impact-shrinking-department-educations-changes-involving-student-borrowers-repayment-rules/16007586/
  7. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/global-education-student-loans-market
  8. https://thefinancialbrand.com/news/payments-trends/consumer-lending-to-pick-up-in-2025-186906
  9. https://builtin.com/articles/fintech-lending-applications
  10. https://www.reddit.com/r/moderatepolitics/comments/1h0nqx0/would_getting_rid_of_guaranteed_student_loans_be/
  11. https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/fintech-lending-market-22833
  12. https://money.com/best-banks-for-students/
  13. https://www.skyquestt.com/report/fintech-lending-market
  14. https://www.goodwinlaw.com/en/insights/publications/2025/01/insights-finance-ftec-whats-next-for-fintechs-in-2025
  15. https://www.fintechfutures.com/techwire/private-student-loans-market-to-reach-980-8-billion-globally-by-2032-at-10-1-cagr-allied-market-research/
  16. https://www.debt.com/student-loan/types/private/best/
  17. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/fintech-market-108641
  18. https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/Assessing-the-Impact-of-New-Entrant-Nonbank-Firms.pdf
  19. https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/cfpb-survey-reveals-impacts-of-student-loan-debt-relief-and-repayment-challenges/
  20. https://www.techmagic.co/blog/fintech-trends/
  21. https://educationdata.org/student-loan-refinancing
  22. https://www.cato.org/briefing-paper/ending-federal-student-loans
  23. https://www.spglobal.com/_assets/documents/ratings/research/101610419.pdf
  24. https://www.cnbc.com/select/best-big-banks-for-student-loan-refinancing/
  25. https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation/debt-relief-info
  26. https://www.accenture.com/content/dam/accenture/final/industry/banking/document/Accenture-Banking-Top-10-Trends-2025-Report.pdf
  27. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/student-loans/best-private-student-loans/
  28. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-student-loan-debt-trends-economic-impact
  29. https://www.independentbanker.org/article/2025/02/05/kick-lending-up-a-notch-with-digital-solutions
  30. https://www.nerdwallet.com/best/loans/student-loans/student-loan-refinance-companies
  31. https://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/rpr_2_6.pdf
  32. https://www.credible.com/student-loans/best-student-loan-companies
  33. https://globalxetfs.co/en/fintech-momentum-could-continue-into-2025/
  34. https://money.usnews.com/loans/student-loans/best-private-student-loans
  35. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025-would-increase-costs-block-debt-cancellation-for-student-loan-borrowers/
  36. https://fineksus.com/top-banking-and-fintech-trends-for-2025/
  37. https://www.nasfaa.org/news-item/34788/What_a_Second_Trump_Term_Could_Mean_for_Student_Financial_Aid
  38. https://www.globalxetfs.com/fintech-momentum-could-continue-into-2025/
  39. https://www.lendingtree.com/student/
  40. https://www.businessinsider.com/personal-finance/student-loans/best-student-loan-refinance-companies
  41. https://studentaid.gov/understand-aid/types/loans/interest-rates
  42. https://www.bankrate.com/loans/student-loans/private-student-loans/
  43. https://www.mossadams.com/articles/2025/02/2025-financial-services-outlook
  44. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/07/31/2024-16838/request-for-information-on-bank-fintech-arrangements-involving-banking-products-and-services
  45. https://www.usnews.com/banking/student-accounts
  46. https://hesfintech.com/blog/lending-trends-2025/
  47. https://fintech-market.com/blog/consumer-lending-trends-in-2025
  48. https://www.siegemedia.com/strategy/fintech-statistics
  49. https://firstpagesage.com/business/fintech-valuation-multiples/
  50. https://www.retailbankerinternational.com/features/banking-and-payments-experts-share-sector-forecasts-for-2025/
  51. https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/industry/credit-and-lending
  52. https://tcf.org/content/commentary/the-assault-on-the-save-plan-has-brought-student-debt-relief-to-a-crossroads/
  53. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/fintechs-a-new-paradigm-of-growth
  54. https://www.studentloanprofessor.com/student-loan-companies/
  55. https://www.businessinsider.com/personal-finance/student-loans/best-private-student-loans
  56. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/student-loan-forgiveness-what-know-ahead-2025
  57. https://www.acainternational.org/news/three-fintech-predictions-for-2025/
  58. https://www.datocms-assets.com/23873/1728379495-final_07-10_pledge-impact-report.pdf
  59. https://futureskillsacademy.com/blog/fintech-in-student-loan-management/
  60. https://plaid.com/resources/fintech/fintech-trends/
  61. https://milkeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/FinTechFeb2025.pdf
  62. https://geniusee.com/single-blog/fintech-industry-trends
  63. https://www.businessinsider.com/personal-finance/student-loans/best-graduate-student-loans
  64. https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/student-loan-market-22878
  65. https://www.consumerfinanceandfintechblog.com/2024/09/cfpb-settles-action-against-student-loan-servicer-with-industry-ban/
  66. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/student-loans/best-low-interest-student-loans/
  67. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/regulatory/articles/future-of-fintechs-risk-and-regulatory-compliance.html
  68. https://protectborrowers.org/elon-and-doge-are-attempting-to-illegally-delete-the-cfpb/

Monday, March 24, 2025

Joining two anti-Trump events this month (Bryan Alexander)

Over the past two weeks I carved out time to participate in two anti-Trump in-person events.  In this post I wanted to share some notes on the experiences, along with photos.

Last Thursday, after the regular Future Trends Forum session, my son Owain and I went to a local town hall led by our federal representative, Democrat Suhas Subramanyam. It took place in a community center and was very crowded, packed with people.  Before it began I didn’t hear much discussion, but did see some folks with anti-Trump and -Musk signs.  I found some seats for Owain and I and we each opened up a Google Doc on our phones to take notes.

Subramanyam took the stage and began with some brief remarks, starting with citing the dangers of DOGE. He mentioned working in the United States Digital Service during the Obama administration, the unit which DOGE took over as its institutional base. Subramanyam described why he voted against the continuing resolution to keep the government running and also spoke to the humanitarian and governmental problems of firing so many federal workers.

Subramanyam town hall 2025 March 20 rep on stage

Then it was over to questions. Folks lined up before two (somewhat functional) microphones. They told personal stories: of being lifelong federal workers, or having family members in those positions, and now facing their work being undone or their jobs ruined. Some spoke of depending on federal programs (SNAP, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security) and fearing cuts to them.  Several had military experience, which won applause from the room. Above all was this seething sense that Trump was a brutal and extraordinary threat, that Democrats weren’t taking it seriously, and the question: what can we do to fight back? Subramanyam listened hard to each one and answered thoughtfully, respectfully, often pointing to resources or actions we could take.

Subramanyam town hall 2025 March 20 questioner leaning forward
Ever the extrovert, I joined the microphone line right away. I was going to ask about threats to higher education, but happily someone else beat me to it. The representative offered a positive response, praising the work of researchers and teachers, urging us to fight for educators.  So, standing in line, I came up with another question.  When my turn came I began by thanking the representative for actually doing a real town hall meeting, not a scripted thing. I compared this meeting favorably to Vermont’s town hall tradition, and mentioned Bernie Sanders as a comparable example of someone who also knows how to do a community meeting well, and the room erupted in applause.

So I asked about climate change, how we – academics and everyone – can do climate work in this situation. I noted how the crisis was worsening, and how Trump was going to make things even more difficult. I was impressed to have Subramanyam’s full attention while I spoke.  I was equally impressed that he replied by supporting my remarks and work, then called for more climate action in the face of Trump’s actions.

Nobody got a photo of me that I know of, so here’s a shot of the representative (on right) paying close attention to one resident (standing on left).

(A sign of climate in culture today: people applauded my question. After I left the mic, several folks reached out to me – literally – to thank me for raising the topic.)

Returning to that question of what can be done to oppose Trump, Subramanyam and questioners listed these actions:

    • Legal action: filing lawsuits and supporting other people’s.  Getting Democratic politicians to do the same.
    • Congressional investigations into Trump: the Congressman pointed out that these can expose administrative malfeasance and build resistance.
    • Flat out resistance to Trump actions. Subramanyam argued that when people refuse to comply, the admin sometimes backs down, saying they made a mistake.
    • Doing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to get the feds to cough up documentation. They can slow-walk queries or outright refuse, of course, but FOIA can produce results.
    • Phone calls to people in red counties. (I think this was aimed at calling GOP officials, but am not sure.
    • People telling stories of Trump harms in whatever setting works. At one point Subramanyam said if the GOP wants to “flood the zone” with bogus content we should flood it right back with true, personal stories.

There were no calls for property damage or violence against people. Nor did anybody used the phrase “civil disobedience” or called for such actions.

The hour grew late and people started to drift out.  Owain and I had to get home and we filed out as well.

Two weeks ago I joined a different event, a rally for science in Washington, DC.  It took place at the Lincoln Memorial.  Several thousand people were there, all ages, races, genders. The mood was upbeat despite the chill and strong winds.

A podium rested on the steps and from there spoke quite the program of luminaries, including Bill Nye (I missed him), Francis Collins (just stepped down as NIH head), Atul Gawande (excellent medical writer, also surgeon), Phil Plait (astronomer, science communicator), and some other people I didn’t recognize. There was some singing, too.

Dr. Gawande

The overall theme was that Trump’s science cuts were awful.  Speakers hit on points under this header, such as that RFK was a dangerous idiot and that research reductions meant that human lives would be harmed and lost.  Diversity along race and gender lines was vital.  All kinds of science were mentioned, with medicine and public health leading the charge.

The consensus was on returning science funding to what it was under Biden, not in expanding it. There were no claims for adding scientific overviews to policy – it was a defensive, not offensive program.

There were plenty of signs.  Some had a fine satirical edge:

Off to one side – well, down along the reflecting pool – there was an Extinction Rebellion performance or group appearance, but I didn’t get to see if they staged anything besides looking awesome and grim.

Stand up for science rally DC 2025 March 7_XR group

During the time I was there no police appeared. There weren’t any counterprotesters.

Eventually I had to start the trip home.  As I walked along the reflecting pool towards the Metro station I heard speakers continuing and the roar of the appreciative crowd.


What can we take away from these two events?

There is a fierce opposition to Trump and it occurs across various sectors of society, from scientists to everyday folks (with some overlap!). Pro-Trump people didn’t appear, so I didn’t see arguments or worse between groups. I don’t know if this means that the president’s supporters are just confident or prefer to work online.

The Democratic party is not in a leadership role.  Outrage precedes and exceeds its actions so far.  The town hall liked Subramanyam, but it was clear they were bringing demands to him, and that he did not back the party leadership.

Both events had a strong positive feel, even though each was based on outrage. There was a sense of energy to be exerted, action to be had.

Many people visibly recorded each event, primarily through phones. I didn’t see anyone object to this.  (I tried to get people’s permission to photograph them, when they were clearly identifiable individuals.)

My feel is that climate interest is waning among people who oppose Trump.  They aren’t denying it and will support those who speak and act on it, but it’s no longer a leading concern.

Yet these were just two events, a very small sample size, and both in roughly the same geographic area, about 50 miles apart.  We can’t seriously generalize from this evidence, but hopefully it’s a useful snapshot and sample.

Personally, I found both to be rewarding and supportive. It was good to be with people who were similarly outraged and willing to be so in public.

American readers, are you seeing anything similar in your areas?  Non-Americans, what do you think of this glimpse?

[Editors note: This article first appeared at BryanAlexander.org.]

Upcoming Events April 1st and April 8th (Higher Ed Labor United)


Higher Ed Labor United Banner

April 1: How the Department of Education's Destruction Impacts Higher Education

Yesterday, Trump signed an executive order to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education. This comes on top of recent mass firings and funding cuts. The Dept of Ed provides vital services and support both for higher education and K-12, but we aren't always aware of its impact.

On Tuesday, April 1, impacted workers and union leaders will discuss what higher education loses when the Department of Education is destroyed and how we can respond collectively. We will provide details on organizing next steps. Join us for the conversation on April 1.
 
Register for April 1
4/1 How the Dept of Ed's destruction impacts higher ed at 8pm ET

April 8: Kill the Cuts Nationwide Actions

By cutting funds to lifesaving research and medical care, the Trump administration is abandoning families who are suffering and costing taxpayers billions of dollars. These cuts are dangerous to our health, and dangerous to our economy.

On Tuesday, April 8th, 2025 workers across the country are standing up and demanding NO cuts to education and life-saving research.

Organize an action for April 8 or join one already in the works.
 
Register for an April 8 Action
Kill the cuts – save lifesaving research, healthcare, and education - April 8, 2025

Want to support our work? Make a contribution.

We invite you to support HELU's work by making a direct financial contribution. While HELU's main source of income is solidarity pledges from member organizations, these funds from individuals help us to grow capacity as we work to align the higher ed labor movement.
 
Contribute to HELU