[Editor's note: The FY 2023 FSA Annual Report is here.]
In 2014, the father-son team of Joel Best and Eric Best published The Student Loan Mess: How Good Intentions Created a Trillion Dollar Problem. Their argument was that rising student loan debt posed a major social and economic problem in the United States, exceeding $1 trillion at the time of publication (predicted to reach $2 trillion by 2020). This "mess" resulted from a series of well-intentioned but flawed policies that focused on different aspects of the issue in isolation, ultimately creating unintended consequences.
Key Points of the 2014 book:
History of Federal Involvement: The book explored the evolution of federal student loan programs, highlighting how each policy change created new problems while attempting to address the previous ones.
Cost of College: Rising tuition fees along with readily available loans fueled the debt crisis, as students borrowed more to cope with increasing costs.
Repayment Challenges: The authors delved into the difficulties graduates face repaying their loans, including high interest rates, complex repayment plans, and limited income mobility.
Societal Impacts: The book examined the broader societal consequences of student loan debt, such as delayed homeownership, reduced entrepreneurship, and increased economic inequality.
Beyond the Mess: While acknowledging the complexity of the issue, the authors discussed potential solutions, including loan forgiveness programs, income-based repayment plans, and increased government regulation of for-profit colleges.
Overall, "The Student Loan Mess" provided a critical historical analysis of the factors contributing to the crisis and suggested pathways towards a more sustainable system of higher education financing.
Expansion of Federal Loan Programs (1960s-1990s):
The creation of federal loan programs initially aimed to increase access to higher education.
This led to rising tuition costs as universities saw guaranteed funding, with less pressure to remain affordable.
Loan eligibility expanded, encouraging more borrowing even without clear career prospects for graduates.
Cost Explosion and Predatory Lending (1990s-2000s):
College costs skyrocketed due to various factors, including decreased state funding and increased administrative spending.
Loan limits were raised, further fueling the debt increase.
Private lenders entered the market, offering aggressive marketing and deceptive practices, targeting vulnerable students.
Recession and Repayment Struggles (2008-present):
The Great Recession exacerbated loan burdens as graduates faced limited job opportunities and stagnant wages.
Complex repayment plans and high interest rates created a challenging landscape for borrowers.
The rise of for-profit colleges further complicated the issue, often saddling students with debt for degrees with low earning potential.
Growing Awareness, Advocacy, and Reform (2010s-present):
Public awareness of the student loan crisis grew, leading to increased advocacy and demands for reform.
Issues like predatory lending, debt forgiveness, and income-based repayment gained traction.
In 2010, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act made a significant change to the federal student loan system. Previously, the government guaranteed private loans, meaning it reimbursed lenders if borrowers defaulted. In turn, lenders received subsidies for participating. The Act ended these subsidies for private lenders, resulting in over $60 billion saved that could be reinvested in student aid programs.
Debates on the role of government and private lenders in financing higher education continued.
Next Chapters?
Since 2014, almost ten years after the Student Loan Mess was published, several major developments have unfolded concerning student loan debt:
Growth and Persistence:
Debt continues to climb: While the growth rate has slowed somewhat, outstanding student loan debt has surpassed $1.7 trillion and remains a significant burden for millions of borrowers.
Racial and socioeconomic disparities persist: African American and Latinx borrowers disproportionately hold a higher amount of debt compared to white borrowers, exacerbating economic inequalities.
Policy Changes:
https://x.com/The Biden-Harris administration has provided $136.6 billion in debt relief.
Expansion of income-driven repayment plans: Options like Income-Based Repayment (IBR) and Pay As You Earn (PAYE) have been expanded, allowing borrowers to adjust their monthly payments based on income.
Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) challenges: Legal uncertainties and administrative backlogs have plagued PSLF, leaving many public servants struggling to qualify for loan forgiveness.
Temporary pandemic relief: During the COVID-19 pandemic, federal student loan payments were paused and interest rates set to 0%. Payments resumed in 2023.
Debt cancellation debates: Proposals for broad-based student loan forgiveness have gained traction, with several Democratic lawmakers pushing for different cancellation amounts. However, these proposals have faced legal and political hurdles. In 2023, the 9th Circuit Court ruled in favor of mass cancellation of loans from predatory for-profit colleges (Sweet v Cardona). A few months later, the US Supreme Court struck down President Biden's plan for debt relief to more than 30 million Americans.
Increased attention to for-profit colleges and online program managers: Scrutiny of predatory practices and low graduate outcomes at for-profit institutions has intensified. Gainful employment rules have been reestablished, but whether they will be enforced is in question.
Looking forward:
The future of student loan debt remains uncertain. Key questions include:
Will broad-based loan forgiveness materialize?
Can income-driven repayment plans be made more effective?
How will future administrations address affordability and access to higher education?
What role will the private sector play in financing higher education?
How will declining enrollment numbers and skepticism about the value of higher education affect student loan debt and debt relief?
Will higher ed institutions be held accountable for the debt of their former students and alumni?
Policy Drivers:
Economic factors: A strong economy could increase government revenue, potentially enabling broader debt forgiveness or increased funding for higher education access initiatives. Conversely, an economic downturn could make policy interventions more challenging.
Elections and political pressure: Public opinion and the results of future elections will influence the political will for reform. Continued activism and pressure from advocacy groups could sway policy decisions.
Legal challenges and court rulings: Lawsuits over debt cancellation programs and loan servicer practices could impact the legal landscape and shape future policy options.
Private sector involvement: Developments in the private student loan market and potential regulations of lending practices could affect access to credit and repayment options.
Consumer Decisions:
Debt burden and economic outlook: The level of outstanding debt and future job prospects will significantly influence borrower behavior. Increased debt loads could incentivize riskier repayment strategies or delaying major life decisions like homeownership.
Awareness and financial literacy: Improved understanding of loan terms, repayment options, and alternative financing methods could empower borrowers to make informed decisions.
Government programs and incentives: Changes to income-driven repayment plans, loan forgiveness programs, and other government initiatives will directly impact consumer choices about managing their debt.
Emerging Trends:
Alternative financing models: Innovations like income-share agreements and skills-based financing could disrupt traditional loan structures and offer new options for students.
Technology and automation: Increased use of technology to streamline loan management and repayment could improve efficiency and transparency.
Focus on affordability and value: As concerns about the value proposition of higher education grow, there might be a shift towards emphasizing affordable options and skills-based learning.
How does student loan debt affect the lives of Americans?
Student loan debt has a profound impact on the lives of millions of Americans in various ways, affecting not just their finances but also their major life decisions and overall well-being. Here's a breakdown of some key areas:
Financial Impact:
Burden of debt: The average graduate has over $40,000 in student loan debt, significantly impacting their monthly budget and disposable income. This can limit savings for retirement, emergencies, and major purchases like a house.
Lower credit scores: Missed payments or delinquencies can negatively affect credit scores, hindering access to future loans and increasing interest rates on other forms of credit.
Delayed milestones: High debt burdens may cause individuals to delay major life milestones like buying a home, getting married, starting a family, or pursuing further education due to financial constraints.
Career Choices:
Job dissatisfaction: To make loan payments, some graduates might feel pressured to stay in high-paying but unfulfilling jobs, sacrificing career satisfaction for financial stability.
Entrepreneurial risk: The fear of financial failure due to debt may discourage individuals from pursuing entrepreneurial ventures, hindering innovation and economic growth.
Limited career mobility: Debt may lock individuals into specific career paths based on earning potential, restricting their ability to pursue desired career changes.
Mental and Emotional Wellbeing:
Stress and anxiety: The constant pressure of debt repayment can lead to significant stress and anxiety, impacting mental and emotional well-being.
Lower self-esteem: Feelings of financial instability and hopelessness can negatively impact self-esteem and overall life satisfaction.
Stigma and discrimination: Some individuals may face social stigma associated with student loan debt, further exacerbating the emotional burden.
Societal Impact:
Economic inequality: Student loan debt disproportionately affects certain groups, like minorities and low-income students, perpetuating and widening economic inequality.
Lower homeownership rates: High debt burdens can hinder homeownership, negatively impacting the housing market and contributing to wealth disparities.
Reduced consumer spending: Debt-burdened individuals have less disposable income, limiting their purchasing power and affecting the overall economy.
Social Class and Student Loan Debt
There's a well-documented and intricate relationship between social class and student loan debt, characterized by significant inequalities and disparities. Here's a breakdown of some key points:
Higher burden on lower classes:
Borrowing rates: Individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are more likely to borrow student loans due to limited family resources and higher college costs compared to their income.
Debt amounts: Borrowers from lower socioeconomic backgrounds often take on larger debt loads due to higher tuition fees and living expenses, often exceeding their earning potential after graduation.
Repayment challenges: They face greater difficulty repaying loans due to lower-paying jobs, making them more susceptible to delinquency and default. This hinders wealth accumulation and upward mobility.
Contributing factors:
Limited financial support: Lack of parental financial support or savings forces students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds to rely heavily on loans for college expenses.
Limited college options: Limited access to affordable, high-quality educational institutions often steers individuals towards for-profit colleges with deceptive practices and low graduation rates, leading to high debt with limited job prospects.
Ongoing Debate
There is ongoing debate on solutions to address the student loan crisis, with proposals ranging from broad-based loan forgiveness to reforms in higher education financing and income-driven repayment plans. The future of student loan debt and its impact on Americans remains uncertain and depends on various factors, including policy decisions, economic trends, and individual financial choices.
Image of Ann Bowers, courtesy of the Debt Collective
Resistance to Debt Relief
The reasons why some people might not support student loan forgiveness. Some conservatives believe that it is unfair to forgive the debts of those who willingly took out loans, while others believe that it would be a waste of taxpayer money. Additionally, some believe that student loan forgiveness would not address the root causes of the problem, such as the high cost of tuition.
It is important to note that not all conservatives oppose student loan forgiveness. Some support income-based repayment plans or public service loan forgiveness. Additionally, some believe the government should focus on making college more affordable, rather than simply forgiving existing debt.
According to a 2019 poll by the Pew Research Center, 54% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents opposed forgiving all student loan debt, while 37% supported it.
Student Loan Debt Power Analysis: Who Benefits from Inaction?
There are elites and elite organizations who are (at least on the backstage) against student loan debt relief: student loan servicers (e.g. Maximus, Nelnet, Navient, and Sallie Mae), big banks, large corporations, and the US military. For them, debt serves as a way to get others to do their bidding. Debt is essential as a leverage tool to recruit and retain workers. Debt relief could also create more competition for better, more meaningful jobs, which some elites may not want for their children. States may be unwilling or unable to further subsidize higher education if elites are unwilling to pay. This situation is likely to worsen as Medicaid budgets are used for a growing number of elderly and increasingly disabled Baby Boomers.
Related links:
Borrower Defense Claims Surpass 750,000. Consumers Empowered. Subprime Colleges and Programs Threatened.
Student Loans and a Brutal Lifetime of Debt (Dahn Shaulis and Glen McGhee)
At this point, the entire higher Ed financing system is too far gone to ever be repaired, and colleges are far too expensive for typical families to afford without going into debt. Cancelling all the debt and holding higher Ed accountable for astronomical costs is only the beginning. Other wealthy nations do a far better job educating and training their populace and the US needs to follow their lead. Healthcare, higher Ed and training, and prisons never be allowed to operate like savage capitalist enterprises. It’s bad for society. The US can do better- if it doesn’t, it will only contribute to accelerating our ongoing societal collapse.
ReplyDeleteColleges are asked to do too much - taking care of students mental health, physical health and more. Until we shift our view of the role of gov't and publicly funded institutions as the function and role of government, things will not change. Those making money off of others are uninterested in an educated citizenry. When others are in debt those in power stay in power and continue to create laws and systems that benefit them. Unchecked capitalism without government oversite is only going to get the same results as we have. Massive wealth for a few while most others are powerless and just trying to survive so they don't have the time, education, access or networks to change the system.
ReplyDelete